The 24-70mm f/2.8 VR is a great lens! When I had a D750, my 24-70mm remained fixed on it 95% of the time. 24-70mm is a excellent focal length for many functions. Nikon33's gear list: Nikon33's gear list

Physically, the Z 24-200mm f4.0-6.3 VR is a very small and lightweight lens making it an ideal travel companion. Even compared to the diminutive Z 24-70mm f4.0 S it is only 73g heavier and 6mm longer – at 24mm focal length. Combined with a maximum magnification of 1:3.6 at a minimum object distance of 0.7m the lens looks like a real all

Nikon Z 70-200mm f2.8 VR S review; Nikon Z 24-200mm f4-6.3 VR review; Nikon Z 20mm f1.8 S review; Zhongyi Mitakon Speedmaster 50mm f0.95 III review; Nikon Z 24mm f1.8 S review; Nikon Z 58mm f0.95 Noct review; Nikon Z 85mm f1.8 S review; Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S review; Nikon Z 24-70mm f2.8 S review; Nikon Z 50mm f1.8S review; Nikon Z 35mm f1.8S review

Many reviewers criticized the lens heavily for its performance, claiming it to be a soft lens when compared to its predecessor, the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G. And some even put it as the winner in the “worst lens release of 2015” category. Did Nikon engineers really screw up in updating one of the most popular pro-grade lenses?

Considerably more compact and lightweight than the latest Nikon AF-S 24-70mm lens and at only half the purchase price, it’s a good choice if you don’t need the faster f/2.8 aperture. Read more: • Best camera lenses to get • Best Canon lenses • Best Nikon lenses • Best Sony lenses

Following is a comparison with the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 OS Art, the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR and the Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC (1st generation). The Sigma was shot on a D810 with an older, less contrasty print of the test-target and a little less sharpening of 35/0.5/36/10: Above: Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC G2 on D850 at 24mm, f2.8
The clear winner here is the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G, which shows excellent center, mid-frame and corner sharpness, especially when stopped down. The Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 suffers quite a bit in the corners due to field curvature. Here, we can see that the Tamron suffers greatly at anything beyond 50mm, showing very poor overall performance.
2. Vignetting. Even though the Nikon Z 28-75mm f/2.8 is an f/2.8 lens, it arguably beats the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 in vignetting performance! The vignetting performance of the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR is pretty suspect, especially at 24mm. Even though the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR improves dramatically at 35mm and beyond, the ridiculous levels of vignetting at
Perhaps interesting to know for other members. I just had my trusty 24-70 repaired after 8 years of hard use. The zoom and focus rings were getting stiffer as many users will recognise (still usable though), the rubber was getting very worn, and during a recent event I tripped on a staircase and dropped the camera + lens where it got a couple of pretty hard knocks. oCLajk.
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/291
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/17
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/652
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/190
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/939
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/638
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/344
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/569
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/976
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/73
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/789
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/362
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/25
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/490
  • a3lb1g0ow7.pages.dev/439

    • nikon 24 70mm f2 8 vr review